Tivoli Motorcycle Racing Facility – Motoland
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- Who owns the motorcycle facility?
- Where can I find information about the planning approval?
- How long has the facility been operating?
- Can the 1974 approval be revoked?
- Can Council change the 1974 approval?
- Did Motoland Pty Ltd get council approval for the new track work and racing every weekend?
- Why was there no community consultation on the change in land use?
- Can Council place additional noise, dust and other restrictions on the land use?
- Why isn’t an Entertainment Venue Licence required under a Local Law?
- Does Motoland Pty Ltd have a liquor licence and security staff?
- Is the vegetation on the site identified as Koala Habitat protected under the Planning Regulation?
- Has Council met with Motoland to discuss it’s impacts on residents?
- When did Council receive complaints about the use?
- What has Council done in response to these complaints?
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- Who owns the motorcycle facility?
Motorcycling Queensland (MQ) own the land at 62 Coal Road Chuwar; 145-179 Robin Street Chuwar and Lot 136 Unnamed Road Chuwar
- Where can I find information about the planning approval?
The approval for the use, was granted by Moreton Shire Council on 4 December 1974. The planning approval for the use of the land for ‘motorcycle racing’ is available here. The application material that was lodged is available here.
The approval is quite open and does not include many conditions or requirements. The conditions are as follows;
- The provision of an effluent disposal system to the satisfaction of the Council
- The provision of a 2-metre landscaped buffer strip around the perimeter of the property.
The approval did not include any plans identifying the locations of the tracks or other facilities. Accordingly, the shape and location of the track has changed over time, all within the authority of this approval.
An additional approval was granted by Moreton Shire Council on 25 November 1977. This planning approval was for the hire of the existing clubhouse to organisations for dances, barbecues, receptions etc., including the preparation of meals. This approval is available here. The application material that was lodged is available here.
- How long has the facility been operating?
Ownership details identify that the land has been owned by motorsport related entities (such as the Auto Cycle Union of Queensland) since 1948. Historically, the facility itself has existed on the land since the 1960’s, as shown in the images below these FAQ's.
- Can the 1974 approval be revoked?
No. Council is unable to revoke or otherwise take away the approval. Once an approval has been given, it ‘runs with the land’ and exists unless it is cancelled by the landowner, abandoned or a new land use is taken up.
The 1974 Letter has continued to have lawful effect via the transitional provisions of the various Planning Acts that have existed over the years.
- Can Council change the 1974 approval?
No. Council is unable to make a change to the conditions of the approval without an application being lodged to Council by an applicant.
Most modern development approvals would include plans and conditions which would include restrictions on appropriate noise levels and operating hours. This consent does not include any restrictions on noise levels and operating hours and Council is unable to make changes to include new restrictions.
- Did Motoland Pty Ltd get council approval for the new track work and racing every weekend?
No. A new approval is not always required when a new tenant moves to a site (such as a real estate agent office changing to an accountant’s office). A new application is not required for the works and activities occurring on the site where the use of the site is in accordance with the existing approval. The open-ended nature of the approval permits motorcycle racing activities on the site, including activities that are ancillary to racing, such as practice sessions or time trials. In most cases, an approval makes references to plans which provide some limit to the areas where activities can occur. The 1974 approval does not make references to any plans.
While Motoland have increased the use of the site recently, Motorcycling Queensland have carried out similar events and track work over the years without changes to the development approval in place. The operation of the site by Motoland instead of Motorcycling Queensland does not materially effect the validity of the approval.
Depending on the response to the Environmental Protection Order, there may need to be works that are not consistent with the existing approval. These works may require an application to Council.
- Why was there no community consultation on the change in land use?
As there has been no change in the land use, no application is required and therefore no public notification has been undertaken. While the operator of the site has changed from Motorcycling Queensland to Motoland Pty Ltd, the use of the land remains consistent with the existing approval.
- Can Council place additional noise, dust and other restrictions on the land use?
Council cannot place additional noise, dust or other restrictions on the land use beyond the restrictions set out in the Environmental Protection Act. The purpose of the Environmental Protection Order that has been issued by Council is to ensure compliance with the Act is achieved. Depending on the results of the noise monitoring, there may be additional attenuation measures put in place.
- Why isn’t an Entertainment Venue Licence required under a Local Law?
Previously (up to June 2019), Council issued Moreton District Motorcross Inc an Entertainment Venue Licence under Local Law No.3 (Commercial Licencing). The Entertainment Venue Licence included conditions which restricted dust and noise nuisance.
Local Laws are reviewed regularly and in 2019, Council made amendments to the Local Laws, including Local Law No.3 (Commercial Licencing). Further details can be found here.
The relevant amendment to the Local Law in this instance is the change in the definition of Entertainment Venues. The current definition of an Entertainment Venue is specific and includes locations such as the Ipswich Turf Club and the Ipswich Showgrounds. It does not include the Tivoli facility.
The 2013 Local Law definition of an entertainment venue was much wider and did not include specific locations, only types of locations, such as theatres and fair grounds. The Tivoli facility was captured under this definition and was required to obtain an Entertainment Venue License.
Due to the amendment to the Local Laws, it is unnecessary for Motoland to obtain an Entertainment Venue Licence and Council is unable to apply the same conditions under the previous licences.
- Does Motoland Pty Ltd have a liquor licence and security staff?
The Queensland liquor licence records and Council’s records do not indicate that Motoland Pty Ltd has an application or approved liquor licence.
Liquor licenses and associated security requirements are managed by the Office of Liquor and Gaming Regulation, not by Ipswich City Council.
Information about liquor licenses can be found here.
- Is the vegetation on the site identified as Koala Habitat protected under the Planning Regulation?
The site is identified as containing some areas of Koala Habitat under the Planning Regulation 2017 (refer map below). The Planning Regulations include several exemptions which allow clearing of Koala Habitat without an application to Council or the State Government.
One of the exemptions is set out in Schedule 10, Part 10, Division 2, section 16A(2) of the Planning Regulation 2017.
The exemption (16A(2)) allows development where interfering with koala habitat, provided the clearing is consistent with a development approval. The site currently has a valid development approval (being the 1974 consent letter).
Any new application on the site or any sites without a current development approval would require assessment against the Koala Regulations unless an exemption such as 16A is in effect.
Essentially, the existing approval allows for clearing to occur on the site where it is consistent with the broad approval for motorcycle racing. An example of clearing that would not be consistent with the approval, would be clearing that conflicts with the requirement for a 2-metre landscaped buffer strip around the perimeter of the property.
View the Koala Habitat Areas here.
- Has Council met with Motoland to discuss it’s impacts on residents?
Yes. Council has met with Motoland, both prior to opening and afterwards.
Council met with Motorcycling Queensland in March 2021 as an introductory meeting between MQ and the Mayor and Divisional Councillors.
Topics discussed included:
- History of the facility, including the proposal to develop the land for residential purposes and proposal to relocate to Willowbank (both of which did not eventuate)
- An indication that MQ was looking to partner with Motoland to use the facility, which was to involve a business case investigating options to revamp amenities and improve the site.
- Whether the land use approval would allow for any increase in activity. (After the meeting Council was subsequently supplied with legal advice from MQ that determine the 1974 approval didn’t restrict the proposed operations and they did not require a new Material Change of Use application).
- Council advised MQ to engage with neighbouring properties on the proposed increased activity.
- Conversations with Council’s City Events Manager regarding events at North Ipswich Reserve.
Council met again with Motorcycling Queensland and Motoland representatives in August 2021.
Topics discussed included:
- Advise that site works would be occurring soon, beginning with maintenance and then track improvements.
- Advise that all planned works were to be in accordance with the existing 1974 approval.
- Council advised MQ and Motoland to proactively engage with their neighbours on the proposed increased activity.
Another meeting was held on 9 December 2021 with MQ and Motoland. Topics discussed included:
- Residents’ concerns and complaints about the use, noise and dust as well as concerns regarding the earthmoving machinery and water truck.
- The Environmental Protection Order (EPO) and the obligations to meet broader environmental requirements.
- The Merry Motoland event and plans for future communication with residents.
- Council’s disappointment in MQ and Motoland not engaging and communicating with their neighbours prior to work commencing.
- When did Council receive complaints about the use?
From 3 October 2021, Council received complaints regarding environmental nuisance from surrounding residents. The majority were noise related, specifically motorcycle activity and earthworks activity (including the use of a high-capacity storage water truck). There were also complaints raised regarding stormwater contamination and dust nuisance.
- What has Council done in response to these complaints?
Multiple noise monitoring inspections were undertaken by Authorised Officers between October and November 2021. These monitoring inspections occurred on 9 October, 17 October, 24 October, 3 November and 6 November 2021.
On 29 October 2021, officers attended the site and discussed erosion and sediment control matters with Motoland staff. This site inspection was a direct response to complaints made in relation to stormwater contamination of Sandy Creek due to the ongoing earthworks and the additional tracks created.
On 18 November 2021 under the Environmental Protection Act 1994 (the Act) an environmental protection order (EPO) was issued to Motoland Pty Ltd.
On 21 November 2021 A request from Motoland’s lawyers regarding an extension to requirements listed within the EPO to 31 January 2022.
On 26 November 2021 Council agreed to an extension of 14 days to requirements listed within the EPO.
On 9 December 2021 Council received a request Motoland’s lawyers regarding an extension and/or amendment to requirements listed within the EPO.
On 15 December 2021 Council agreed to an extension of 3 days and some minor amendments to requirements listed within the EPO and updated the EPO.
On 24 December 2021 Council received a request from Motoland’s lawyers regarding an extension to requirements listed within the EPO. Council is currently awaiting further details from Motoland’s lawyers before determining this request.
The EPO is available here.
Motoland responded to the EPO on 24 January 2022 by providing various reports. The response to the EPO is available here.
Council officers' have reviewed these reports and have made the determination that further actions are required by the operator to remedy the environmental nuisances. This is in the form of a new EPO.
The Council officers' report on the response to the EPO is available here.
The new EPO is available here.
The EPO's issued to the operator, are a written statutory tool to undertake specific actions within specific time frames to remedy environmental nuisance and prevent further harm. The EPO sets out reasonable requirements and actions that the operator is required to complete. These requirements and actions will address the non-compliances that have led to the EPO.
To assist with awareness, the following plain language summary of the EPO has been prepared.
1. Motoland are required to construct two acoustic barriers. The barriers are to be 5 metres high from natural ground and require design before it can be constructed. The barriers are to be located adjacent to:
- Holdworths Road; and
- 139 Robin Street.
2. For the barriers mentioned in 1. above, Motoland is required to lodge the necessary operational works within 20 business days of receipt of the revised EPO. The construction of these barriers are be completed within 60 business days from the issuing of Council’s operational approval. Until this work is complete, the number of motorbikes operational at any one time shall be restricted to 20 on the main track.
Note: It is noted that this step has been delayed owing to flood impacts.
3. Motoland are not to use the existing large water truck, tractor and D3 dozer. Instead, machinery such as the posi-track and small water truck that have less noise impacts are to be used on all tracks.
4. The requirements for conducting track maintenance work shall be as follows:
- Must not carry out track maintenance works that makes an audible noise at a residence before 8.00 am or after 5.00 pm
- Cannot make a noise of more than 5dB(A) above the background level from the closest residence from 8.00 am to 5.00 pm
The water pumps must not be used in the following circumstances:
- before 7.00 am, if it makes an audible noise at a residence; or
- from 7.00 am. to 7.00 pm, if it makes a noise of more than 5dB(A) above the background level; or
- from 7.00 pm. to 10.00 pm, if it makes a noise of more than 3dB(A) above the background level; or
- after 10.00 pm, if it makes an audible noise at a residence
5. Motoland must ensure that motorcycling activity being undertaken is as follows:
- Between 5.00 pm and 8.00 am does not make an audible noise; and
- Between 8.00 am to 5.00 pm does not make a noise of more than 70B(A)(leq) at the boundary of a residential property.
6. Motoland is to conduct dust monitoring due to the original response to the EPO being inadequate. The best time for dust monitoring to be conducted would be in the wintertime when the weather is dryer, however, Council requested earlier monitoring.
Note: It is noted that this step has been delayed owing to flood impacts.
7. Motoland is to engage a suitably qualified person (e.g. sound engineer) to undertake sound monitoring of the site for a period of 18 months. This is to include, at minimum:
- free-field measurements (e.g. with sound monitor); and
- noise loggers located within Motoland property but at the property boundary.
A report is to be provided to Council every 3 months, providing the data and analysis. This report is to include an analysis of the results, as well as recommendations to be implemented to ensure compliance with the Environmental Protection Act.
- What happened to the proposal to subdivide the land into residential lots?
On 1 May 2018, Motorcycling Queensland lodged a Development Application to Council for a Variation Request and to subdivide the land into 217 residential lots (application reference number 3268/2018/CA).
On 30 May 2018, Council issued a lengthy information request identifying technical issues with the proposal, as well as noting that the area is predominately large lot acreage style housing. The applicant was advised that a wider local planning exercise would occur following public notification to determine the suitability of the proposal.
On 31 July 2018, the applicant commenced public notification of the development application. Council received 35 submissions. The submissions primarily related to the inappropriate size of the proposed lots, increases to local traffic and concerns about the impact on the Warrego Highway interchange.
On 21 March 2019, the applicant requested to withdraw the application. Accordingly, the proposal was not required to be decided by Council, and the application is no longer of any relevance.
- What happened to the proposal to relocate the facility to Willowbank?
Council owns 350-440 Paynes Road, Ebenezer (44.7 ha) to the immediate west of Queensland Raceway.
Motorcycling Queensland commenced a 30-year lease for this site on 1 May 2015 with the aim of developing a world-class off-road facility to compliment the proposed expansion of Willowbank precinct.
As part of preparations for the off-road facility, MQ undertook significant master planning and design option studies.
MQ was required to transfer all motorsport activities from the Chuwar facility as part of the development of the new site within 3 years of receiving tenure.
Motorcycle Queensland requested a lease termination in October 2017.
In April 2018 following the advice from MQ of its intention to surrender the lease, Council terminated the lease.
In the Development Assessment report lodged as part of the application 3268/2018/CA, it is noted that on page 22, that the redevelopment of the site played a “significant part financially ensuring the ability of Motorcycling Queensland to relocate its long-established Chuwar operations which will also be of substantial benefit to the surrounding residential community of Chuwar, ensuring that local residents are no longer impacted by this long-standing approved use that is no longer consistent with local community desires and expectations”.- How much extra money/rates do ICC receive from Motoland activities?
The Rating Category is 43c Commercial ($500k to $1m). The General Rates are $7,443.80 per annum. There are no rates concessions provided to the property.
- What was discussed at the Community Forum?
At the General Council meeting on 27 January 2022, Council resolved to hold a community forum regarding the Tivoli Raceway. The purpose of the community forum was as follows:
- Residents will be better informed as to the provisions under which the facility operates
- While council has been consulting with a representative group of affected residents, a public meeting will give a better understanding of how many are affected
- When residents get to express their views, Councillors fulfill our obligation, and our sincere desire, to listen to the community
- The impacts of the activity will be acknowledged
- The motorcycling facility operators get to hear residents
- Council reiterates what is possible in response to residents' concerns
- The reinforcement of transparency
The forum was held on Thursday 24 February 2022, between 6:00 pm and 8:00 pm. The notes which were written during the meeting are available in the Forum Summary Report here.
- What's next
Council is monitoring the operation of the track to achieve compliance with the above. This has been further complicated recently owing to the flood event.
It is expected that the EPO is to be complied with. We are monitoring and responding to complaints regarding the EPO. If there is evidence of a breach, we will determine the appropriate action to enforce a correction.
It is also expected that as more information becomes available, there may be a need to either modify or issue a new EPO. For example, if noise or dust monitoring reveals issues that need to be addressed, the best way to address these issues may be with the issuing of a revised EPO.
It is clear that there is a level of frustration regarding the impacts of this activity. Council officers are committed to getting the best outcome possible for the residents and the operator of the facility.
What do I do if I experience a problem or a think that the EPO has been breached?
If you believe that there is an issue, please contact us on 3810 6666 or email council@ipswich.qld.gov.au.
If you feel that there has been a breach of the EPO, please also contact Council. It is important to note that in order for there to be formal compliance action taken, a breach is to occur and evidence of the breach has to be collected by an appropriately qualified officer. It is therefore important to contact Council for these issues.
What if there is a breach on a weekend?
The council number (3810 6666) still works outside of standard business hours, and enables you to lodge a complaint. Officers will respond outside of hours, especially if there are emergent issues. Council officers are also planning to monitor the site and do regular compliance checks. Warning will not be given for when this monitoring is to occur.
History of the Motoland site
Image 1 of 5

1968
From this image, it can be seen that the facility existed prior to the encroachment of the current large lot residential community.
The 1974 approval essentially formalised the existing arrangements on the site.
1 February 1968. Source: Qimagery

1977
The site was particularly popular in the 1970’s, evident from the expansion shown at this time.
1 January 1977. Source: Qimagery
1990
This image shows the further encroachment of residential uses and what was observed to be a decline in the use of the facility.
1 June 1990. Source: Qimagery
2002
This image shows a much larger extent of encroachment of residential uses, as well as the more recent track layout which is similar in extent to the track prior to the current use of the site.
11 March 2002. Source: Qimagery
2021
The most recent aerial imagery shows the early track works.
27 August 2021. Source: Nearmap
What happens next?
Council is monitoring the operation of the track to achieve compliance with the above. This has been further complicated recently owing to the flood event.
It is expected that the EPO is to be complied with. We are monitoring and responding to complaints regarding the EPO. If there is evidence of a breach, we will determine the appropriate action to enforce a correction.
It is also expected that as more information becomes available, there may be a need to either modify or issue a new EPO. For example, if noise or dust monitoring reveals issues that need to be addressed, the best way to address these issues may be with the issuing of a revised EPO.
What do we need from the community:
It is clear that there is a level of frustration regarding the impacts of this activity. Council officers are committed to getting the best outcome possible for the residents and the operator of the facility.
What do I do if I experience a problem or a think that the EPO has been breached?
If you believe that there is an issue, please contact us on 3810 6666 or email council@ipswich.qld.gov.au.
If you feel that there has been a breach of the EPO, please also contact Council. It is important to note that in order for there to be formal compliance action taken, a breach is to occur and evidence of the breach has to be collected by an appropriately qualified officer. It is therefore important to contact Council for these issues.
What if there is a breach on a weekend?
The council number (3810 6666) still works outside of standard business hours, and enables you to lodge a complaint. Officers will respond outside of hours, especially if there are emergent issues. Council officers are also planning to monitor the site and do regular compliance checks. Warning will not be given for when this monitoring is to occur.